Southeast Alaska Conservation v. U.S. Army Corps

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 200606-35679California1,472 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION 

COUNCIL; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 06-35679 v. D.C. No.

UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF

ENGINEERS; et al.,  CV-05-00012-J-JKS District of Alaska, Defendants-Appellees, Juneau COEUR ALASKA, INC.; et al., ORDER Defendant-Intervenors- Appellees.  Filed December 8, 2006

Before: Procter Hug, Jr., A. Wallace Tashima, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Appellee Coeur Alaska, Inc.’s Urgent Motion Under Cir- cuit Rule 27-3(b) to Vacate the Injunction Pending Appeal is denied. The court granted Appellant Southeast Alaska Con- servation Council’s (“SEACC”) Emergency Motion Under Circuit Rule 27-3 on August 24, 2006, at which time the court issued an injunction pending appeal. The court’s order enjoined Coeur Alaska, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”), and the U.S. Forest Service from activities relating to the construction of a disposal facility at Lower Slate Lake. On November 7, 2006, Coeur Alaska filed its motion to vacate the injunction due to weather conditions and in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.