Zepeda-Martinez
United States v. Zepeda-Martinez
Opinion
Opinion
Hall, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 05-50562 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No.
CR-04-02895-LAB
FELIPE ZEPEDA-MARTINEZ,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted September 13, 2006—Pasadena, California
Filed December 13, 2006
Before: Cynthia Holcomb Hall, M. Margaret McKeown, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Hall
19431 19434 UNITED STATES v. ZEPEDA-MARTINEZ
COUNSEL
Kurt D. Hermansen, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, California, for the defendant-appellant.
Mark R. Rehe, Assistant United States Attorney, San Diego, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.
OPINION
HALL, Senior Circuit Judge:
In United States v. Covian-Sandoval, 462 F.3d 1090 (9th Cir. 2006), we determined that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) prevents a sentencing court from enhancing an alien’s sentence based upon a removal subsequent to a prior conviction unless that removal has been admitted by the…