Martinez-Rodriguez

United States v. Martinez-Rodriguez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 200705-50719California5,356 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 05-50719 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-04-02063-NAJ

DAVID MARTINEZ-RODRIGUEZ,  ORDER

Defendant-Appellant. AMENDING

OPINION AND

AMENDED

 OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Napoleon A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 19, 2006—Pasadena, California

Filed November 21, 2006 Amended January 3, 2007

Before: Harry Pregerson, Ronald M. Gould, and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Gould

39 UNITED STATES v. MARTINEZ-RODRIGUEZ

COUNSEL

Stephen D. Demik, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, California, for defendant-appellant David Martinez- Rodriguez.

L. Marcel Stewart, Assistant United States Attorney, San Diego, California, for plaintiff-appellee United States of America.

ORDER

The government’s request to publish paragraph three of the memorandum disposition is GRANTED, and the panel has UNITED STATES v. MARTINEZ-RODRIGUEZ 43 decided to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.