Becker

Becker v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 10, 200705-76977California1,834 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould COUNSEL, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL HERBERT BECKER, 

Petitioner, No. 05-76977 v.  Agency No.

A97-343-613

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted November 17, 2006—San Francisco, California

Filed January 10, 2007

Before: Proctor Hug, Jr., A. Wallace Tashima, and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Gould COUNSEL

Thomas H. Tousley, Law Office of Thomas H. Tousley, Vir- ginia, for petitioner Michael Herbert Becker.

Anthony P. Nicastro, Attorney, Office of Immigration Litiga- tion, Civil Division, United States Justice Department, Wash- ington, D.C., argued for respondent Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney General. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Richard M. Evans, Assistant Direc- tor, and David E. Dauenheimer, Attorney, Office of Immigra- tion Litigation, Civil Division, United States Justice Department, Washington, D.C., were on the brief. 252 BECKER v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.