Ruiz-Vidal

Ruiz-Vidal v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 17, 200704-73812California3,668 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE REYES RUIZ-VIDAL, 

Petitioner, No. 04-73812 v.  Agency No.

A34-639-824

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted October 20, 2006—San Francisco, California

Filed January 18, 2007

Before: Robert R. Beezer, Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Stephen S. Trott, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge O’Scannlain

775 778 RUIZ-VIDAL v. GONZALES

COUNSEL

Robert B. Jobe, Law Office of Robert B. Jobe, San Francisco, California, argued the cause for the petitioner and filed a brief.

Jamie M. Dowd, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued the cause for the respondent and filed a brief. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, and David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, were on the brief.

OPINION

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether the Department of Homeland Security has met its burden of proving that the petitioner is removable from the United States as an alien…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.