Perez

United States v. Perez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 31, 200706-30161California1,220 words

Opinion

Opinion

Facts

In 2004, Albert Tito Perez (“Perez”) pleaded guilty to con- spiracy to distribute methamphetamine, distribution of methamphetamine, and money laundering. Perez was sen- tenced to a term of 70 months imprisonment. Perez appealed, requesting re-sentencing under United States v. Booker, 543

U.S. 220 (2005).

On appeal, we held:

We vacate and remand for re-sentencing under the post-Booker advisory guidelines because Perez requested a remand and we conclude from the dis- trict court’s comments at Perez’ sentencing hearing that there is a “reasonable probability that [Perez] UNITED STATES v. PEREZ 1145 would have received a different sentence had the dis- trict judge known that the sentencing guidelines were advisory.” United States v. Beaudion, 416 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2005).

Sentence VACATED and REMANDED.

Perez, 142 F. App’x at 305-06 (unpublished memorandum disposition).

On remand, the district court scheduled a sentencing hear- ing for November 2, 2005. The re-sentencing hearing was res- cheduled for February 16, 2006 because Perez was hospitalized with valley fever.

On January 13, 2006, because Perez remained hospitalized, Perez filed an unopposed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.