Butz

Butz v. Mendoza-Powers

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 1, 200706-71137California1,812 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GEORGE FRANKLIN BUTZ,  No. 06-71137 Petitioner, D.C. No. v. CV-98-07584- KATHY MENDOZA-POWERS, Acting  ER-AN Central District Warden, Respondent. of California, Los Angeles

 ORDER

Filed February 1, 2007

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge, Stephen Reinhardt and Michael Daly Hawkins, Circuit Judges.

COUNSEL

Rich Pfeiffer, Santa Ana, California, for the petitioner.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of the State of California, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Kenneth C. Byrne, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and Tita Nguyen, Deputy Attorney General, for the respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner George Franklin Butz (“Butz”) filed an applica- tion for permission to file a second or successive petition for 1209 1210 BUTZ v. MENDOZA-POWERS writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Butz seeks consideration of the merits of claims presented in his first habeas petition. The district court dismissed that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.