Ross

United States v. Ross

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 8, 200706-30204California1,438 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rymer COUNSEL, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 06-30204 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No.

CR-05-207-WFN

JAMES DOUGLAS ROSS,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington William Fremming Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 14, 2006—Seattle, Washington

Filed February 8, 2007

Before: Pamela Ann Rymer, Marsha S. Berzon, and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Rymer COUNSEL

Kathleen Moran, Federal Defenders of Eastern Washington & Idaho, Spokane, Washington, for the defendant-appellant.

George J.C. Jacobs, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Spokane, Washington, for the plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

RYMER, Circuit Judge:

James Douglas Ross appeals a supervised release condition imposed following his conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. 1556 UNITED STATES v. ROSS § 924(a)(1)(A), making a false statement or representation regarding the acquisition of a firearm. We affirm.

I

Ross was administratively separated from the United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.