Daniel Padilla-Partida v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
462 F.2d 619
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 10, 197271-2831California115 words
Opinion
Appellant asks us to reverse the well-established law of this Circuit, which has considered the plain and clear provisions of Sec. 212(a) (23) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182 (a) (23).
This Congressional enactment makes any alien excludable “who has been convicted of a violation of . any law or regulation relating to the illicit possession of or traffic in narcotic drugs or marijuana. . . .”
We decline to reverse our previous positions.
In view of our position, we need not consider other matters raised on this appeal.
Other Circuits specifically agree with this Circuit. E. g., Gonzalez de Lara v. United States, 439 F.2d 1316 (5th Cir., 1971).
Affirmed.