Ramadan

Ramadan v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 21, 200703-74351California6,327 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NEAMA EL SAYED RAMADAN; GASER  No. 03-74351

HESHAM EL GENDY,

Petitioners, Agency Nos. v.  A79-561-874

A79-561-875

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney

ORDER AND

General,

OPINION

Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted August 12, 2005—San Francisco, California Opinion Filed November 2, 2005 Reheard and Resubmitted July 25, 2006—San Francisco, California Opinion Withdrawn February 22, 2007

Filed February 22, 2007

Before: Harry Pregerson, Michael Daly Hawkins, and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion

2023 2026 RAMADAN v. GONZALES

COUNSEL

Amos Lawrence, San Francisco, California, for the petition- ers.

Peter D. Keisler, Richard M. Evans, Carl J. McIntyre, Jr., David J. Kline, Bryan S. Beier, Washington, D.C., for the respondent. RAMADAN v. GONZALES 2027 Lucas Guttentag, Jennifer Chang, Oakland, California; Lee Gelernt, Omar C. Jadwat, New York, New York; Mary Ken- ney, Washington, D.C., for amici curiae American Civil Lib- erties Union Foundation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.