Mendez

United States v. Mendez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 22, 200705-10205California1,489 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY1

At approximately 9:18 p.m. on December 21, 2003, two Phoenix gang enforcement officers pulled over a car driven by Mendez because it did not appear to have a license plate or temporary registration tag. Both officers testified that the sole purpose of the stop was “no registration.” The officers, Detectives Jaensson and Bracke, approached the car. Det. Jaensson told Mendez why they had stopped him and asked for “his identification or license.” Mendez presented a Cali- fornia identification card. Det. Jaensson then instructed him to get out of the vehicle and interlock his hands behind his head. He proceeded to pat him down for weapons, during which time he noticed a tattoo on Mendez’s left hand. The pat-down produced no weapons. Det. Jaensson then instructed Mendez to sit on the curb behind his car.

Det. Jaensson stayed with Mendez at the curb while Det. Bracke took the identification card to the patrol car to conduct a records check. While waiting for Det. Bracke to complete the records check, Det. Jaensson again noticed the tattoo on 1 Our recitation of the facts is based primarily on the testimony adduced at the suppression hearing.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.