Sadler

United States v. Sadler

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 200706-10234California4,808 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

On August 10, 2005, a jury found Philip Martin Sadler guilty of one count of conspiracy to transport illegal aliens for private financial gain, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324(a)(1) (A)(v)(i), 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii), and 1324(a)(1)(B)(i); and two counts of transporting illegal aliens for private financial gain and placing in jeopardy the life of an alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 1324(a)(1)(B)(i). The district court entered judgment against Sadler on December 5, 2005.

On December 1, 2005, Sadler’s trial attorney filed a motion to withdraw as his attorney, indicating in the motion that he had already filed a notice of appeal on behalf of Sadler. The trial court granted the motion on December 16, 2005 and appointed replacement counsel to “represent the Defendant in all further proceeding[s], including but not limited to the appeal now pending before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.”

Sometime thereafter, Sadler’s replacement counsel discov- ered that Sadler’s trial attorney had never actually filed the notice of appeal. On March 1, 2006, Sadler’s new counsel filed with the district court a motion entitled “Motion to Accept Delayed Notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.