Kelley

United States v. Kelley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 200705-10547California6,092 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rymer, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 05-10547 Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  D.C. No.

CR-05-00125-PJH

KENNETH KELLEY,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 20, 2006—San Francisco, California

Filed March 1, 2007

Before: Sandra Day O’Connor, Associate Justice (Ret.),* Pamela Ann Rymer, and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Rymer

*The Honorable Sandra Day O’Connor, Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court (Ret.), sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 294(a).

2285 2288 UNITED STATES v. KELLEY

COUNSEL

Amber S. Rosen, Assistant United States Attorney, San Jose, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Elizabeth M. Falk, Assistant Federal Public Defender, San Francisco, California, for the defendant-appellee.

OPINION

RYMER, Circuit Judge:

Kenneth Kelley’s home computer was searched for images of child pornography pursuant to a warrant based on informa- tion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.