Fort

United States v. Fort

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 7, 200706-10473California5,618 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 06-10473 EMILE FORT, aka Twin; EDGAR  D.C. No. DIAZ, aka Hook; ROBERT CR-05-00167-WHA CALLOWAY, aka Papa, Defendants-Appellees. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 06-10478 v.  D.C. No.

CR-05-00167-WHA

EMILE FORT, aka Twin; EDGAR DIAZ, aka Hook, ORDER Defendants-Appellants.  Filed March 8, 2007

Before: Susan P. Graber, William A. Fletcher, and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges.

Order; Concurrence by Judge Graber; Dissent by Judge Wardlaw

ORDER

Judges Graber and Tallman voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc. Judge W. Fletcher voted to grant the petitions. 2645 2646 UNITED STATES v. FORT The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court called for a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. On such vote, a majority of the nonrecused active judges failed to vote in favor of en banc rehearing.

The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.