Comer

Comer v. Schriro

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 200798-99003California18,135 words

Opinion

Opinion

Volume 1 of

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT CHARLES COMER, 

Petitioner-Appellant, No. 98-99003 v. DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director, of  D.C. No.

CV-94-01469-ROS

Arizona Department of

OPINION

Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 7, 2007* San Francisco, California

Filed March 15, 2007

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge, Harry Pregerson, Alex Kozinski, Pamela Ann Rymer, Andrew J. Kleinfeld, Kim McLane Wardlaw, William A. Fletcher, Raymond C. Fisher, Richard A. Paez, Richard C. Tallman, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Richard R. Clifton, Jay S. Bybee, Milan D. Smith, Jr., and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.

*The En Banc Court finds this case suitable for decision without further oral argument. See Circuit Advisory Committee Note to Ninth Circuit Rules 35-1 to 35-3, Note 3 (after the en banc court is chosen, the judges on the panel decide whether there will be oral argument).

3113 3114 COMER v. SCHRIRO Per Curiam Opinion; Concurrence by Judge Paez; Dissent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.