Arcos v. Memije v. Gonzales
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CORNELIO ARCOS MEMIJE; MARIA
DEL ROSARIO RENDON VELEZ, No. 06-71282 Petitioners, Agency Nos. v. A96-059-340 ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney A96-059-341 General, ORDER Respondent. Filed March 26, 2007
Before: Harry Pregerson, Richard C. Tallman and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.
Order; Dissent by Judge Pregerson
ORDER
On July 3, 2006, we dismissed this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction. Since that time, petitioners have filed three motions for reconsideration of our July 3, 2006 order. Because petitioners have not identified any points of law or fact overlooked by the court, these motions are denied. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10.
Section 242(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Immigration and Naturaliza- tion Act expressly eliminates our jurisdiction over decisions by the Board of Immigration Appeals that involve the exer- cise of discretion. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i). We lack jurisdiction to review the Immigration Judge’s discretionary determination that Cornelio Arcos Memije and Maria Del