Grisham

Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 3, 200703-55780California427 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LESLIE J. GRISHAM, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PHILIP MORRIS U.S.A., a corporation; BROWN & WILLIAMSON No. 03-55780 TOBACCO COMPANY CORP.,  D.C. No. individually and as successor to CV-02-07930-SVW the American Tobacco Company and its predecessor in interest, British American Tobacco Industries, PLC, Defendants-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

MARIA CANNATA, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 03-56018 PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., aka  D.C. No.

CV-02-08026-ABC

Philip Morris; BROWN &

WILLIAMSON TOBACCO ORDER

CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Audrey B. Collins, District Judge, Presiding

3779 3780 GRISHAM v. PHILIP MORRIS U.S.A. Argued and Submitted December 10, 2004—San Francisco, California

Filed April 3, 2007

Before: Jerome Farris, Dorothy W.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.