Victor Lemus v. Deutsche Bank National Trustee
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201010-15001California350 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ESTELLA M. GUILLEN, an individual, No. 10-15001
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:09-cv-00704-RLH-
PAL
and
VICTOR M. LEMUS, an individual, MEMORANDUM *
Plaintiff,
v.
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL
TRUSTEE; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Roger L. Hunt, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2010 **
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Estella M. Guillen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing her action arising out of a foreclosure. We have jurisdiction under
U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. King v. California, 784 F.2d 910, 912 (9th
Cir. 1986). We affirm.