Victor Lemus v. Deutsche Bank National Trustee

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201010-15001California350 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ESTELLA M. GUILLEN, an individual, No. 10-15001

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:09-cv-00704-RLH-

PAL

and

VICTOR M. LEMUS, an individual, MEMORANDUM *

Plaintiff,

v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL

TRUSTEE; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Roger L. Hunt, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010 **

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Estella M. Guillen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her action arising out of a foreclosure. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. King v. California, 784 F.2d 910, 912 (9th

Cir. 1986). We affirm.

Guillen’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.