United States v. Julio Cardenas-Porras

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201010-50190California246 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50190

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:10-cr-07008-GT

v.

MEMORANDUM *

JULIO ISRAEL CARDENAS-PORRAS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Gordon Thompson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010 **

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Julio Israel Cardenas-Porras appeals from the 15-month sentence imposed

upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Cardenas-Porras contends that the district court procedurally erred at

sentencing by: 1) treating the guidelines as presumptively reasonable; 2) failing to

consider…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.