FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50190

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:10-cr-07008-GT

v.

MEMORANDUM *

JULIO ISRAEL CARDENAS-PORRAS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Gordon Thompson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010 **

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Julio Israel Cardenas-Porras appeals from the 15-month sentence imposed

upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Cardenas-Porras contends that the district court procedurally erred at

sentencing by: 1) treating the guidelines as presumptively reasonable; 2) failing to

consider all of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors; and 3) failing to

adequately explain the sentence or address his mitigation arguments.

Cardenas-Porras further contends that the resulting sentence is substantively

unreasonable. The record reflects that the district court did not procedurally err,

and that, in light of the totality of the circumstances, the sentence is substantively

reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir. 2008) (en

banc).

AFFIRMED.

2 10-50190