United States v. Jose Mendoza

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201010-50077California251 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50077

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:09-cr-01980-LAB

v.

MEMORANDUM *

JOSE HUGO MENDOZA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010 **

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Jose Hugo Mendoza appeals from the 77-month sentence imposed following

his guilty-plea conviction for attempted entry after deportation, in violation of

8 U.S.C. § 1326, and false claim to United States citizenship, in violation of

U.S.C. § 911. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Mendoza contends that the sentence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.