United States v. Fernando Ramon-Xolio

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201010-10014California243 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-10014

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:07-cr-00527-RCC

FERNANDO RAMON-XOLIO,

MEMORANDUM *

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010 **

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Fernando Ramon-Xolio appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 51-month

sentence for assault on a federal officer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1) and

(b). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ramon-Xolio’s

counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion

to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.