United States v. Eduardo Mendizabal
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201009-50450California262 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DEC 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-50450
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00549-GHK
v.
MEMORANDUM *
EDUARDO JOSE MENDIZABAL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. King, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2010 **
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Eduardo Jose Mendizabal appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and
48-month sentence for possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§ 2252A(a)(5)(B). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
Mendizabal’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). with a motion to withdraw as counsel of…