United States v. Eduardo Mendizabal

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201009-50450California262 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DEC 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-50450

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00549-GHK

v.

MEMORANDUM *

EDUARDO JOSE MENDIZABAL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. King, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010 **

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Eduardo Jose Mendizabal appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and

48-month sentence for possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 2252A(a)(5)(B). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

Mendizabal’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). with a motion to withdraw as counsel of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.