United States v. Dwayne Falconer
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201009-55165California234 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-55165
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:92-cr-00749-SVW
v.
MEMORANDUM *
DWAYNE ALLEN FALCONER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2010 **
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Dwayne Allen Falconer appeals pro se from the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a reduced sentence. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Falconer contends that he is entitled to a reduced sentence in light of the
crack-cocaine amendments to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.…