East Bay Automotive Council v. National Labor Relations Board

Good Law
483 F.3d 628
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 16, 200704-74997, 04-75871, 05-71144California2,666 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Scannlain, J.

We must decide whether to enforce an affirmative bargaining order issued by the National Labor Relations Board after nearly eight years of litigation involving an automotive dealer and a union in Oakland, California.

I

East Bay Automotive Council and its affiliated local unions (“the Union”), and M & M Automotive Group, Inc., d/b/a Broadway Volkswagen (“the Employer”), appeal the National Labor Relations Board’s (“the Board”) decision to issue an affirmative bargaining order pursuant to a labor dispute between the Union and the Employer. The Board seeks enforcement of its order.

The Employer is an automotive dealer in Oakland, California. On December 15, 1997, the Union was certified as the exclusive collective bargaining representative of approximately 16 service and parts department employees at the dealer. On January 20, 1998, the parties began collective bargaining for their first contract. During the year 1998, the parties met on approximately 12 occasions. The Union was repre sented at the bargaining table by business representatives Don Crosatto, Craig Andrews, Ron Paredes, and by employee representatives Tim Finnerty and Gunnar Peterson. The Employer was represented by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.