United States v. David Lefler
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201009-50634California449 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-50634
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:05-cr-02313-LAB-
v.
MEMORANDUM *
DAVID LYLE LEFLER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2010 **
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges
David Lyle Lefler, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se a “Notice of Document
Discrepancies” order in which the district court rejected his motion for return of
property under Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g). We review de novo a district court’s
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). decision to deny a Rule 41(g) motion. United States v. Ritchie, 342 F.3d 903, 906
(9th Cir. 2003). We reverse and…