United States v. David Lefler

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201009-50634California449 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-50634

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:05-cr-02313-LAB-

v.

MEMORANDUM *

DAVID LYLE LEFLER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010 **

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges

David Lyle Lefler, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se a “Notice of Document

Discrepancies” order in which the district court rejected his motion for return of

property under Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g). We review de novo a district court’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). decision to deny a Rule 41(g) motion. United States v. Ritchie, 342 F.3d 903, 906

(9th Cir. 2003). We reverse and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.