Richard Shelley v. Quality Loan Service Corp.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201009-56133California379 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD SHELLEY, pro se, No. 09-56133

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 8:09-cv-00291-CJC-

MLG

v.

QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP. and MEMORANDUM *

LITTON LOAN SERVICING, LLP,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

FREMONT INVESTMENT & LOAN,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010 **

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Richard Shelley appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his

Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo. King v. California, 784 F.2d 910, 912 (9th Cir.

1986). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.