Richard Shelley v. Quality Loan Service Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201009-56133California379 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RICHARD SHELLEY, pro se, No. 09-56133
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 8:09-cv-00291-CJC-
MLG
v.
QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP. and MEMORANDUM *
LITTON LOAN SERVICING, LLP,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
FREMONT INVESTMENT & LOAN,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2010 **
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Richard Shelley appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his
Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We review de novo. King v. California, 784 F.2d 910, 912 (9th Cir.
1986). We…