Randy Soderstrom v. Tony Rackauckas
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201009-56976California264 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RANDY LEE SODERSTROM, No. 09-56976
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 8:08-cv-00309-PA-SS
v.
MEMORANDUM *
TONY RACKAUCKAS, District Attorney; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2010 **
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Randy Lee Soderstrom, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the
district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. Accordingly, Soderstrom’s request for publication is denied. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). a claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo,