Randy Soderstrom v. Tony Rackauckas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201009-56976California264 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RANDY LEE SODERSTROM, No. 09-56976

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 8:08-cv-00309-PA-SS

v.

MEMORANDUM *

TONY RACKAUCKAS, District Attorney; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010 **

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Randy Lee Soderstrom, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. Accordingly, Soderstrom’s request for publication is denied. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). a claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo,

Kirtley v. Rainey, 326…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.