King
United States v. King
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 05-10629 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No.
CR-03-00215-WBS
DAVID R. KING,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William B. Shubb, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 16, 2006—San Francisco, California
Filed April 18, 2007
Before: Robert R. Beezer, Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, and Stephen S. Trott, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge O’Scannlain COUNSEL
James R. Greiner, Sacramento, California, argued the cause for the defendant-appellant and filed a brief. 4382 UNITED STATES v. KING Michelle Rodriguez, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, California, argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellee, and filed a brief. McGregor W. Scott, United States Attorney, was also on the brief.
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, we must decide whether a criminal defen- dant’s right to a speedy trial under either the Speedy Trial Act or the Sixth Amendment was violated.