Mildred Freeston v. Bishop, White & Marshall, P.S.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201010-35312California297 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MILDRED C. FREESTON and SHIRSHA No. 10-35312
SUMERU,
D.C. No. 3:09-cv-05560-BHS Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v. MEMORANDUM *
BISHOP, WHITE & MARSHALL, P.S.;
et al.,
Defendants - Appellees,
PIERCE COUNTY; et al.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2010 **
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Mildred C. Freeston and Shirsha Sumeru appeal pro se from the district
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s judgment dismissing their action under the Truth in Lending Act and state
law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. King v.