Cir
Mary Sundberg v. Cir
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201009-70538California233 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARY SUNDBERG, No. 09-70538
Petitioner - Appellant, Tax Ct. No. 16635-
v.
MEMORANDUM *
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court
Submitted December 14, 2010 **
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Mary Sundberg appeals pro se from the tax court’s order dismissing her
petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction under
U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review de novo. Abrams v. Comm’r, 814 F.2d 1356,
1357 (9th Cir. 1987) (per curiam). We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The tax court properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction because