Jorge Guadarrama v. F. Lo

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201009-56601California343 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JORGE GUADARRAMA, No. 09-56601

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00078-MMA-

AJB

v.

F. LO, M.D.; et al., MEMORANDUM *

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Michael M. Anello, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010 **

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Jorge Guadarrama appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal of an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). action for failure to state a claim. Nelson v. Heiss, 271 F.3d 891, 893 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.