Freda Tanuvasa v. Fdic

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201010-55180California286 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FREDA TANUVASA, No. 10-55180

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:09-cv-02795-DDP-

AGR

v.

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE MEMORANDUM *

CORPORATION, Successor to Washington Mutual Savings Bank (“WaMu”); et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010 **

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Freda Tanuvasa appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing her

claims arising under the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”). We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. King v. California, 784 F.2d 910,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.