Freda Tanuvasa v. Fdic
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201010-55180California286 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FREDA TANUVASA, No. 10-55180
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:09-cv-02795-DDP-
AGR
v.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE MEMORANDUM *
CORPORATION, Successor to Washington Mutual Savings Bank (“WaMu”); et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2010 **
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Freda Tanuvasa appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing her
claims arising under the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”). We have jurisdiction
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. King v. California, 784 F.2d 910,…