Cir

Earl Pluard v. Cir

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201009-70536California232 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EARL PLUARD, No. 09-70536

Petitioner - Appellant, Tax Ct. No. 16201-07L

v.

MEMORANDUM *

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court

Submitted December 14, 2010 **

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Earl Pluard appeals pro se from the tax court’s order dismissing his petition

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C.

§ 7482(a)(1). We review de novo. Abrams v. Comm’r, 814 F.2d 1356, 1357 (9th

Cir. 1987) (per curiam). We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The tax court properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction because Pluard

was never issued a Notice of Deficiency or a Notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.