Daniel Trebas v. Robert Knapp

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201009-55594California254 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL JAMES TREBAS, No. 09-55594

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-04809-FMC-

PLA

v.

ROBERT KNAPP; et al., MEMORANDUM *

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Florence-Marie Cooper, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010 **

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Daniel James Trebas appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of his constitutional

rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Huftile

v. Miccio-Fonseca, 410 F.3d 1136, 1138 (9th Cir. 2005), and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.