Daniel Trebas v. Robert Knapp
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 201009-55594California254 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL JAMES TREBAS, No. 09-55594
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-04809-FMC-
PLA
v.
ROBERT KNAPP; et al., MEMORANDUM *
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Florence-Marie Cooper, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2010 **
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Daniel James Trebas appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of his constitutional
rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Huftile
v. Miccio-Fonseca, 410 F.3d 1136, 1138 (9th Cir. 2005), and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The…