Bpa

Golden Nw Aluminum v. Bpa

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 2, 200703-73426California8,858 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GOLDEN NORTHWEST ALUMINUM, 

INC.,

Petitioner,

PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF

No. 03-73426 

COWLITZ COUNTY,

Petitioner-Intervenor, BPA No. Power Act WP-02 v.

BONNEVILLE POWER

ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent. 

PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF 

BENTON COUNTY; PUBLIC UTILITY

DISTRICT NO. 1 OF COWLITZ

COUNTY; PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT

NO. 1 OF FRANKLIN COUNTY; PUBLIC

UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF GRANT

COUNTY; PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT No. 03-73707 NO. 1 OF GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY;  BPA No. PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF Power Act WP-

PEND OREILLE COUNTY; THE CITY

OF SEATTLE, SEATTLE CITY LIGHT

DEPARTMENT (“GENERATING PUBLIC

UTILITIES”), OF COWLITZ COUNTY;

WASHINGTON PUBLIC UTILITY

DISTRICT NO. 1, OF FRANKLIN

4883 4884 GOLDEN NORTHWEST ALUMINUM v. BPA

COUNTY, WASHINGTON; PUBLIC 

UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF GRANT

COUNTY; WASHINGTON PUBLIC

UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF PEND

OREILLE COUNTY; WASHINGTON,

THE CITY OF SEATTLE; CITY LIGHT

DEPARTMENT; BLACHLY-LANE

ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE

ASSOCIATION; CENTRAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.