Fifield
United States v. Fifield
Opinion
Opinion
TASHIMA, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 06-30171 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No.
CR 03-0042 DWM
BLAINE TRAVIS FIFIELD,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 8, 2007* Seattle, Washington
Filed May 7, 2007
Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, A. Wallace Tashima, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Tashima; Concurrence by Judge O’Scannlain; Concurrence by Judge Tashima
*The panel unanimously finds this case appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)(C). COUNSEL
John Rhodes, Assistant Federal Defender, Missoula, Montana, for the defendant-appellant.
Eric B. Wolff, Assistant United States Attorney, Billings, Montana, for the plaintiff-appellee.
OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
On his first appeal, Blaine Travis Fifield was granted a lim- ited remand pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 5172 UNITED STATES v. FIFIELD 1073 (9th Cir.…