Betz
Betz v. Trainer Wortham
Opinion
Opinion
Gould COUNSEL, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HEIDE BETZ,
Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 05-15704 TRAINER WORTHAM & COMPANY, D.C. No.
CV-03-03231-SI
INC.; DAVID P. COMO; FIRST
REPUBLIC BANK, a Nevada OPINION corporation; ROBERT VILE, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Susan Yvonne Illston, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 12, 2007—San Francisco, California
Filed May 11, 2007
Before: John T. Noonan, Jr., Ronald M. Gould, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Gould COUNSEL
Joseph M. Alioto, San Francisco, California, Theodore F. Schwartz, St. Louis, Missouri, and Myron Moskovitz, Berke- ley, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.
Sara B. Brody and Alexander M.R. Lyon, Heller Ehrman, LLP, San Francisco, California, for the defendants-appellees.
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether Heide Betz’s federal securities fraud claim is barred by the statute of limitations.1 We hold that Betz’s claim is…