Orkin

Orkin v. Taylor

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 200705-55364California3,983 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thomas, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREW J. ORKIN; F. MARK ORKIN; 

SARAH-ROSE JOSEPHA ADLER; A.

No. 05-55364

HEINRICH ZILLE,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,  D.C. No.

CV-04-08472-RGK

v.

OPINION

ELIZABETH TAYLOR,

Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 12, 2007—Pasadena, California

Filed May 18, 2007

Before: William C. Canby, Jr. and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges, and Suzanne B. Conlon,* District Judge.

Opinion by Judge Thomas

*The Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

5861 5864 ORKIN v. TAYLOR

COUNSEL

Thomas J. Hamilton, Byrne Goldberg & Hamilton, PLLC, Washington, DC, for the appellants.

Steven Alan Reiss, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, New York, New York, for the appellee.

OPINION

THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

Descendants of Jewish art collector Margarete Mauthner (collectively, “the Orkins”) claim that their ancestor was ORKIN v. TAYLOR 5865 wrongfully…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.