Meiners

United States v. Meiners

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 200706-30389California993 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 06-30389 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No.

CR-05-00065-JDS

EVERT MEINERS,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Jack D. Shanstrom, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 12, 2007* Seattle, Washington

Filed May 21, 2007

Before: Alex Kozinski and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges and Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge.**

Per Curiam Opinion

*This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). **The Honorable Andrew J. Guilford, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. Mark S. Werner and Anthony R. Gallagher, Federal Defend- ers of Montana, Billings, Montana, for appellant Evert Meiners.

William W. Mercer and Marcia Hurd, United States Attor- ney’s Office, Billings, Montana, for appellee United States of America.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Defendant-Appellant Evert Meiners operated a child por- nography file server (“f-serve”), which he utilized…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.