Sandoval-Sandoval

United States v. Sandoval-Sandoval

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 200706-30370California671 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 06-30370 v.  D.C. No.

CR-05-00004-JDS

NESTOR SANDOVAL-SANDOVAL,

a.k.a. Hector Lopez, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Jack D. Shanstrom, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 10, 2007* Portland, Oregon

Filed May 23, 2007

Before: Harry Pregerson, Pamela Ann Rymer, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion

*This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). COUNSEL

L. Sanford Selvey II, Selvey Law Firm, LLC, Billings, Mon- tana, for the defendant-appellant.

Michael S. Lahr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Helena, Montana, for the plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Defendant Nestor Sandoval-Sandoval stands convicted of one count of illegal reentry of a deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He raises two issues in this timely appeal. First, he disputes the district court’s order compelling a set of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.