Doe

United States v. Doe

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 29, 200705-50474California4,696 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 05-50474 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No.

CR-04-01599-RGK

JOHN DOE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 05-50781 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No.

CR-04-01599-RGK

JOHN DOE,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 5, 2007—Pasadena, California

Filed May 29, 2007

Before: Cynthia Holcomb Hall, Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge O’Scannlain

6331 6334 UNITED STATES v. DOE

COUNSEL

Jonathan D. Libby, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, California, argued the cause and filed a brief for the UNITED STATES v. DOE 6335 defendant-appellant. Sean K. Kennedy, Acting Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, California, was also on the brief.

Rupa S. Goswami, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, California, argued the cause and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.