Lenihan

United States v. Lenihan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 30, 200706-30488California1,595 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 06-30488 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No.

CR-05-00150-SEH

JAMES DENNIS LENIHAN, III,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 11, 2007* Portland, Oregon

Filed May 30, 2007

Before: Harry Pregerson, Pamela Ann Rymer, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion

*This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

6485 6488 UNITED STATES v. LENIHAN

COUNSEL

Mark D. Meyer, Great Falls, Montana, for the defendant- appellant.

Joseph E. Thaggard, Assistant United States Attorney, Great Falls, Montana, for the plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

James Dennis Lenihan III appeals his conviction on Count III for possession of a firearm by a person convicted of a mis- demeanor crime of domestic violence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9), on the footing that his guilty plea to the predicate misdemeanor was accepted in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.