Carnes

Carnes v. Zamani

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 200705-15084California1,630 words

Opinion

Opinion

Holland, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PHILLIP CARNES; JENNIFER CARNES; 

KATHRYN SCHALLER; KEVIN

SCHALLER; H. GENE CARNES, No. 05-15084 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.  D.C. No.

CV-00-20084-RMW

MICHAEL A. ZAMANI; OPINION

NANCY ZAMANI,

Defendants-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Ronald M. Whyte, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 10, 2007—San Francisco, California

Filed June 4, 2007

Before: Procter Hug, Jr. and William A. Fletcher, Circuit Judges, and H. Russel Holland,* District Judge.

Opinion by Judge Holland

*The Honorable H. Russel Holland, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation. COUNSEL

J.D. Sullivan and Ross S. Heckmann, Sullivan Law Offices, Minden, Nevada, for the appellants.

Michael A. Zamani, pro se, San Jose, California, argued on his own behalf. Timothy E. Herr, Herr & Zapala, San Jose, California, was on the brief for the appellees. 6706 CARNES v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.