Reynoso-Cisneros
Reynoso-Cisneros v. Gonzales
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIA DOLORES REYNOSO-
CISNEROS,
No. 05-71803 Petitioner, v. Agency No.
A92-554-471
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney
OPINION
General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 16, 2007*
Filed June 7, 2007
Before: Harry Pregerson, Stephen Reinhardt, and A. Wallace Tashima, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam Opinion
*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Murray D. Hilts, Esq., Law Offices of Murray Hilts, San Diego, California, for the petitioner.
Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, California; Marion E. Guyton, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for the respon- dent.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Maria Dolores Reynoso-Cisneros, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen exclu- sion proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review questions of law, including an agency’s…