MacIel

MacIel v. Cir

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 6, 200704-75716California4,990 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. Background

During a routine audit in 1994, the IRS determined that Maciel had significantly understated his income on several tax MACIEL v. CIR 6929 returns. The agency referred Maciel’s case for criminal prose- cution. After initially charging Maciel with two felony counts of tax evasion in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201, the govern- ment filed a superseding information on September 23, 1998, charging Maciel with two felony counts of willfully filing a false return in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1). Unlike § 7201, which requires proof that the defendant “willfully attempt[ed] . . . to evade or defeat” the payment of tax, § 7206(1) requires only proof that the defendant “[w]illfully make[ ] and subscribe[ ]” a materially false return. 26 U.S.C. §§ 7201, 7206(1); see also United States v. Boulware, 384 F.3d 794, 810 (9th Cir. 2004); Considine v. United States, 683 F.2d 1285, 1287 (9th Cir. 1982).

Maciel entered a plea agreement with the government in which he pled guilty to both § 7206(1) counts and admitted signing tax returns he knew to be inaccurate for both the 1991 and 1992 tax years. The plea agreement stated that one of two Sentencing Guidelines…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.