Murdoch

Murdoch v. Castro

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 11, 200705-55665California4,555 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

On May 17, 1983, four men robbed the Horseshoe Bar in Long Beach, California. In the course of the robbery, one MURDOCH v. CASTRO 7137 bystander was shot and killed; another was stabbed and severely wounded. The men recovered approximately $200 from the cash register and left behind a fingerprint. The crime went unsolved until 11 years later, when advances in finger- print technology enabled police to identify Dino Dinardo as one of the perpetrators.

Officers arrested Dinardo on June 30, 1994, in Berkeley, California. When first questioned, Dinardo denied any involvement in the crime, but later recanted, admitting his involvement in the robbery, and identifying Murdoch as one of his accomplices. Both Dinardo and Murdoch were charged with murder accompanied by special circumstances.

Dinardo was tried first. At a suppression hearing that pre- ceded his trial, Dinardo testified that his confession to the Long Beach police had been coerced, and that he had given the confession in exchange for a promise that he would be released to see his wife and daughter. Dinardo was convicted and was sentenced to 25 years’ to life imprisonment. At sen- tencing,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.