Sprint v. Telephony Pcs v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 12, 200705-56076California10,050 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bright, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SPRINT TELEPHONY PCS, L.P., a  Delaware limited partnership, Plaintiff-Appellant- Cross-Appellee, and PACIFIC BELL WIRELESS LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, dba Cingular Wireless, Plaintiff, Nos. 05-56076 v. 05-56435 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; GREG COX, D.C. No. in his capacity as supervisor of the County of San Diego; DIANNE  CV-03-1398-BTM JACOB, in her capacity as ORDER AND supervisor of the County of San AMENDED Diego; PAM SLATER, in her OPINION capacity as supervisor of the County of San Diego; RON ROBERTS, in his capacity as supervisor of the County of San Diego; BILL HORN, in his capacity as supervisor of the County of San Diego, Defendants-Appellees- Cross-Appellants.  Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry Ted Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted October 26, 2006—Pasadena, California

7163 7164 SPRINT TELEPHONY PCS v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO Filed March 13, 2007 Amended June 13, 2007

Before: Myron H. Bright,* A.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.