Horvath
United States v. Horvath
Opinion
Opinion
GRABER, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 06-30447 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No.
CR-06-00004-DWM
WILLIAM CODY HORVATH,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 11, 2007—Portland, Oregon
Filed July 10, 2007
Before: Harry Pregerson, Pamela Ann Rymer, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Graber; Dissent by Judge Rymer
8217 8220 UNITED STATES v. HORVATH
COUNSEL
Daniel R. Wilson, Measure, Robbin & Wilson, P.C., Kalis- pell, Montana, for the defendant-appellant.
Joshua S. Van de Wetering, Assistant United States Attorney, Missoula, Montana, for the plaintiff-appellee.
OPINION
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Any person who knowingly and willfully makes a materi- ally false statement to the federal government is subject to criminal liability under 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a). Congress chose to exempt from criminal liability, however, false statements submitted to a judge by a party to a judicial proceeding. 18 U.S.C. §…