Diaz-Luevano
United States v. Diaz-Luevano
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 05-50129 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No.
CR-04-01371-DMS
LUIS DIAZ-LUEVANO,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 7, 2006* Vacated March 1, 2006 Resubmitted July 11, 2007 Pasadena, California
Filed July 18, 2007
Before: Alex Kozinski, Stephen S. Trott, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam Opinion
*This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Marisa L. Dersey & Zandra L. Lopez, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, California, for the defendant- appellant.
Carol C. Lam, Roger W. Haines, Jr., Garrett M. Heenan & Mary D. Fan, United States Attorney, San Diego, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Appellant Luis Diaz-Luevano appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we…