Plumlee

Plumlee v. Masto

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 10, 200704-15101California147 words

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LARY JAMES PLUMLEE, 

Petitioner-Appellant, No. 04-15101 v. D.C. No.

CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO,  CV-00-00244-

Attorney General State of Nevada; DWH/VPC

E.K. MCDANIEL, ORDER

Respondents-Appellees.  Filed August 10, 2007

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three- judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

1 Judge Rawlinson is recused.

9867

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2007 Thomson/West.